Feed aggregator
Is Your Government Crashing Your Family and Your Home?
Do you love me?
Sincerity Marriage Concept
Man Sues Son-in-Law for $1Mil for Infidelity
Carey M. Stein is suing his son-in-law, Stephen C. Levey for $1 million for fraud and breach of contract in that Levey promised to remain faithful to Stein’s daughter with no intention of doing so in exchange for Stein’s willingness to pay for the wedding.
Stein alleges Levey engaged in sexual activity with prostitutes in various sex clubs in Toronto, Long Beach, and Seattle while he and his wife were trying to conceive. Stein alleges Levey became infected with one or more STD’s and continued sexual relations with his wife knowingly without informing her of this intentionally putting her at risk of infection.
Stein alleges repeated fraud, malice, and oppression and repeated mental cruelty without provocation from his daughter and seeks punitive and exemplary damages at $1,000,000.
http://www.onpointnews.com/docs/stein%20v%20levy.pdf
Best for the Child
How do you feel about this lawsuit? Feels good, doesn’t it?
Yet, I have to ask a painful question. What if the woman were the unfaithful party?
If the woman were unfaithful, would we blame the man for failing to keep the affections of his wife? Would we assume he was not attentive enough? Would we defend her right to leave a relationship that is not meeting her needs in pursuit of a better man?
Isn’t that the chivalrous and “Christian” thing to do?
Is justice Christian? Is God just?
Family courts excuse their lack of focus on justice by claiming their focus is on the best interest of the children. So one spouse whores around with another lover, files an unjust restraining order, flings tons of false accusations and innuendos toward the faithful spouse, and may even for a time attempt to play their two lovers against each other in a narcissistic, self-serving competition. And our butt-headed, irresponsible, arrogant jackass of a kangaroo court system will proceed to drag the faithful spouse into court to be robbed of marriage, home, children, property, and future income. And because the faithful spouse is raped by our American system of family court justice, the faithful spouse is angry, and that anger is the very justification the courts use to say the unfaithful spouse was justified to leave. What stupidity to think that such lies could be believed by anyone other than someone with less brains than a common doorknob! How dare they! Jerks! Thank God there is a hell for them to go to and may all who support them willfully find their places in the worst corners of hell if they won’t turn from this sin!
Of course there is every reason to be angry. And is this anger cause for requiring “anger management” or “parenting skills” training?
No. Truth is, if people are not angered by this, then something is wrong. The person who is not angered by this is a v ery sick and pathetic person. That person has no concept of love, of justice, of integrity, of decency, of responsibility.
Yet the robbed spouse is left feeling compelled to pay and pay and pay. Pay protection money to an attorney who like a Mafia thug helps create and sustain the danger that drives the faithful to pay. Pay child support money. Oh, child support is defended easily by pointing to the slimeballs who run around getting girls and women pregnant leaving them to deal with the children left behind. But, the only similarity between those slimeballs who deserve to be saddled with child support and the faithful parent unjustly robbed is that the name of the agency that brings injustice to one and justice to the other happens to have the same name. In truth, this hides robbery, rape, and injustice behind an honorable name, and that, my friend, is hypocrisy.
Why call this rape? Because many would not give themselves sexually to another person without the bonds of marriage. They would never give themselves or cause children to be born into a situation that could not provide the foundation of family security and the promise of life-long faithfulness and love.
So, when the wedding vows are given without any willingness to accept responsibility for faithfulness to those vows, the faithful spouse is led by fraud into sexual relationships they would not be willing to engage in without such binding promises.
That is rape.
And our family courts are instigators and participants of that rape.
A million times per year in America.
Thus, the American government and the American people rape approximately 3,000 faithful victims per year under the holy name of marriage.
When will it end? When we uproot the unilateral no-fault divorce laws that perpetuate this rape and robbery and one one minute sooner.
Many people point out that when a man cheats, he is doing what is expected, but when a woman cheats, she is being a slut or a whore. Women are not considered truly feminine if they’re not monogamous, and men are not considered masculine if they are monogamous.
But, don’t real men have the courage and integrity to honor their vows? And if women want to be “strong”, shouldn’t they be strong enough to be morally competent, honest, courageous, and faithful for the well-being of their children? If a woman does not feel bound to her word, then why should we be bound to respect her and trust her word?
However, the party line in family court is that justice is irrelevant and that the core issue is the well-being of the children. However, if the people who said this were sincere, justice would be central to the well-being of the children.
- When you shred families of little children for profit, you’re not fighting for the best interest of the children.
- When drag faithful parents into family court to be robbed you hurt the children deeply.
- When you pretend to set aside justice in the interest of the children, you are no more ethical or sincere than a thug that holds a gun to a child’s head for ransom demanding money for the well-being of the children. When you pimp for the liars, cowards, and whores who cheat on their marriages, you destroy the children’s foundations for security which include justice, integrity, faithfulness in marriage, and endurance of love. The wronged parent not only has the right to be angry, but every decent human being has a moral obligation to be angry over this. If you’re going to make pathetic excuses for pimping for the wayward spouse to the loss of the family, I wish you would just die and go to hell rather than poison the rest of the world blathering on about your pursuit of the well-being of the children because if you can rob a faithful parent, you cannot promise the children won’t be robbed either now or later in life. So, cut the hypocrisy and lies. And yes, please DO quote me on that.
- When you won’t allow parents to disapprove of adultery, you are corrupting the children morally.
- When family courts coddle adultery, they commit fraud. They cause marriage to become a facade without substance, a deliberate deception, a fake bond, a lie that pretends a binding covenant exists, a lie for gain with a reward for violating that covenant.
- When you destroy the security of the marriage, you destroy the security of the children.
- When you punish the innocent for the sins of the guilty, you destroy the security of the children, and you enable, encourage, and promote the sins that cut to the root of the family and destroy it.
- Defending injustice for the sake of conflict avoidance, that is cowardice and deceit.
- When you say you support marriage but defend the laws that destroy it, you are a liar and a hypocrite.
- When you disapprove of the anger that people feel when their family is ripped to shreds with adultery, and when you blame the person’s anger for causing the divorce, you give an answer to the question of how a loving God could send anyone to hell, and to those I would say, to hell with you, and good riddance, and may your burning be the most miserable of all for the damage you do to society and to the honor of God and to the love of justice and all that is good!
- Bullying the faithful into silence for fear of losing their children is grounds for violence and war. It is just cause. Nobody should be allowed to get away with this kind of crime against society. Hanging would be too good for the likes of them.
- Bullying the faithful into silence may work for the time that the parents may be deprived of their children unjustly. And often such parents may feel they can be silent for now but when their children are 18, there will be hell to pay and there will be no silencing. But, by then, so many have been battle worn and have become accustomed to being downtrodden and silent for the sake of avoiding greater losses.
From these things, it would seem that some may conclude that there is no solution to the problem within the system and that the support of injustice is too well-financed. Some will resort to immediate violence. Others will plan violence. Others will research it carefully. And others will try to find another way refusing to give up.
History has shown that revolution started this nation and that people died to make that happen. History also shows that the non-violent efforts of Martin Luther King brought fairness effectively. If there is a way to accomplish justice through legal, legitimate, non-violent means with sufficient speed to avoid injustice that is more costly than the cost of violence, then we should consider ourselves morally obligated to seek the non-violent approach.
If it seems violence is the only answer, then a lot of careful analysis and re-analysis should be considered morally mandatory. If you read our Declaration of Independence, you will see quickly that the decision to take that path was weighed very deeply and carefully and the decision to part ways with England was thought out and pursued at great cost.
However, the cost of cowardice is often greater as has been seen in Nazi Germany, slavery in the US, abortion, apartheid, and unilateral no-fault divorce laws. It would seem inevitable that people would be driven to anger and violence from time to time. Some will speak about how wrong that path is.
But, how wrong is it for us to continue giving cause to that violence through our continual defense of injustice?
When I see this man suing his son-in-law, I hope that the suit goes through. It should. A nation that fights for unfaithfulness and abuses the faithful and abandoned parent is not a nation worth fighting for.
God, Religion, and People’s Strange Concepts
Sacrifice to Greek God Apollo
People have weird ideas of religion because people focus on abusing it for their own purposes rather than applying the principles and values of it to their own lives first. Within a location or group, people agree to laws that say if you’re going to live with us, you have to abide by our laws. In the old testament, the law said if you’re going to live as a Jew, you’re not going to practice witchcraft. God and His angels were welcome. Satan and his angels were not. In witchcraft one worshiped various deities to obtain some object of personal desire–protection, wealth, health, perhaps revenge, power, sexual favors, whatever.
But, there was a concept of holiness or faithfulness to one’s god or God or gods.
Some felt the best approach was witchcraft or paganism attempting to get spiritual power from anywhere, anything, or anyone. The concept of one legitimate God was more reasonable to many because it would seems there can be only one “best”. If two or more gods are perfect, they would in essence be one. They would believe the same, know all things, and their power must be directed in the same direction because two all-powerful beings could not conflict or the one who loses wouldn’t be God.
So, if this One God is perfect, all knowing, all powerful, and good, and if our knowledge is limited, then our moral obligation would be to trust and obey this one God for the sake of the greatest universal good. Anything else would be selfish, cowardly, dishonest, sinful.
However, sinners naturally lie concerning the nature of God. Most are willing to hijack the concept of God and put others under false obligation for their own pleasure or protection. They may say, “I am God’s appointed Prophet, and to obey God you have to obey me.” So they through life indulging themselves to the loss of everyone else. So, we have Pharoahs, Emperors, and Kings who were worshiped as gods.
The problem, though, is their character ran counter to the character of God as we all tend to feel it in our bones somehow. Perhaps they lie, murder, have harems, steal other men’s wives and families. and do ungodly things, even in the name of God. So instead of blaming the offender, some people blame religion, most of which have nothing to do with that individual, or they blame God because they feel if He existed, then He could have stopped the offense but chose not to do so.
But, what if the love and integrity and justice of God found it best to create people with a free will and let them have a range of expression of their character so that they, or we, could see for ourselves what we are and where our loyalties lie? What if in order to love we had to be free to hate? What if in order to love or hate we had to be free to bring good or harm to others? What if these limits seem so extreme simply because no matter where God set these limits, they would always be at the edges of our experience and appear extreme for that reason? And what if this is consistent with the love of God?
What if we all sinned and justice demanded hell of us all? And what if God loved us enough to keep the penalty in place so we would be able to tell God we hate Him so much we’d rather go to hell than live with Him in heaven forever? What if God loved us enough to take on the form of man, live faithful and honorable, and die a most miserable death to pay for our sins? What if He created us knowing this would be necessary? What if He had to live from eternity to eternity with perfect anticipation and perfect memory of the pain and joy of every human being who ever lived?
What if God’s love, wisdom, knowledge, power, faithfulness, goodness are really that good? And what if we still hated him?
